Vietnam is one of the fastest-growing economies in the world. The low cost of living and highly qualified population make it an ideal location for foreign companies who are looking to branch out and invest. However, expanding internationally has its disadvantages as well. Not knowing the local laws and regulations makes it a thousand times harder to open a company overseas.
When considering whether to pursue litigation, parties must evaluate several factors, including the timing and anticipated duration of the process, associated costs, the feasibility of enforcing any judgment, and other relevant circumstances. The Vietnamese legal framework operates under a civil law system influenced by French civil law and communist legal theory. Laws are enacted by the National Assembly, which serves as the country's legislative authority.
The Supreme People's Court stands as the highest judicial authority in the country, overseeing three High (or Superior) People's Courts, 63 Provincial or Centrally Run Cities People's Courts (collectively known as Provincial People's Courts), and 710 District People's Courts.
Typically, civil litigation lasts between 12 to 18 months from the initiation of an action until a judgment is rendered by the court of first instance. Appeals in the Courts of Appeal usually require an additional 10 to 14 months, with a similar timeframe for appeals to the Supreme Court.
Vietnamese law imposes no limits on the amount of claims that can be presented in court. However, due to the significant time and expense involved, pursuing a civil suit in Vietnam may not be worthwhile for claims below VND 100,000,000 (approximately USD 4,000).
A plaintiff is required to pay a court filing fee upon submitting a case. This fee is calculated proportionately based on the disputed value or claim amount. After filing a lawsuit, the plaintiff must advance part of the estimated court fee, which will be finalized in the court's judgment.
In civil cases, appeals must be lodged within 15 days following the reading of the judgment. At the appellate level, the appealing party must also deposit additional court costs of VND 300,000 (approximately USD 12) for civil disputes and VND 2,000,000 (approximately USD 80) for commercial disputes.
If any party wishes to engage a lawyer, they must execute a power of attorney authorizing one or more attorneys to represent them in the suit.
For legal entities, all submissions must be executed (signed in wet ink) by the company's legal representative (such as the CEO or director) and bear the company seal. The company may authorize other personnel or counsel to submit documents on its behalf, but the Statement of Claims must be signed personally by the company's representative.
All documents submitted to Vietnamese courts must be in Vietnamese. Foreign documents must be originals or certified copies, notarized, and authenticated/legalized by a Vietnamese consulate authority. A certified translation into Vietnamese is also required for submission. Tilleke & Gibbins has a dedicated team of certified translators who can assist with translations and notarization/authentication.
The evidence disclosure process in Vietnamese civil litigation is less formalized than in common law systems, with no recognized concept of privilege. Parties are generally not obligated to disclose all relevant documents unless specifically requested by the court. If the court requests evidence, compliance is theoretically required; however, there are no penalties specified for non-compliance, and the court typically proceeds based on available documents.
The general statute of limitations for non-contractual civil disputes (e.g., property or family disputes) is three years from when the aggrieved party becomes aware of the infringement of their rights. For commercial disputes (e.g., contractual disputes), the limitation period is two years from the infringement of legitimate rights. Specific provisions exist regarding the statute of limitations for certain dispute types, such as construction and insurance disputes.
Litigation commences when an aggrieved party, the plaintiff, files a lawsuit dossier detailing the facts and allegations supporting their claim with the appropriate court. Below are the primary steps in the litigation process.
Agencies, organizations, and individuals initiating a lawsuit must file a petition directly with the court or send it via postal service. The petition must include documents and evidence demonstrating that the plaintiff's legitimate rights have been violated. The plaintiff may need to provide additional documentation as requested by the court during the case resolution process.
Within three working days of receiving the petition, the chief justice assigns a judge to review it. Within five working days of assignment, the judge must decide to either request amendments to the petition, accept the case through normal or simplified procedures, transfer the petition to a competent court, or return the petition if it falls outside the court's jurisdiction. If accepted, the court will issue a request for the advance court fee, which the plaintiff must pay to the Civil Judgment Enforcement Agency (CJEA) and then submit the payment receipt back to the court. Processing paperwork may take the court up to a month or longer.
The Civil Procedure Code mandates that the plaintiff serve a copy of the lawsuit petition to the defendant, although there are no penalties for failing to do so. Consequently, defendants often learn of the lawsuit only upon receiving the court's notice of acceptance.
Under the Civil Procedure Code and the 2020 Law on Mediation and Dialogue at court, courts are required to promote mediation before proceeding with litigation. Mediators, who may be judges or trained professionals, facilitate this process. Parties can opt out of mediation and proceed with litigation, though many choose to continue negotiations during the litigation phase. Any settlement reached can still be recognized by the judge.
Judges are required to hold meetings to examine submissions, access, disclose evidence, and encourage reconciliation. During these meetings, judges listen to the parties' opinions, promote negotiation, and allow parties to review each other's submissions.
This legal mechanism is available from the filing of the petition until the entry of judgment. Parties may request the court to impose a preliminary injunction, but such requests are rarely granted unless they are well-founded and address urgent needs related to life, health, property preservation, or preventing irreparable harm.
Trials must be oral and conducted in a courtroom. The court directly assesses the case's circumstances by questioning the plaintiff, defendant, and relevant parties, reviewing collected documents and evidence, and listening to debates between the parties.
After deliberation, the trial panel reads the judgment in the presence of the parties. In complex cases, the panel may announce a longer deliberation period of 5-10 days before issuing the official written judgment.
Execution of Judgment Against a Defaulting Party
Judgments from first-instance courts are not immediately final. If no appeal is filed within 15 days of the judgment announcement, the judgment becomes legally effective and enforceable. Should the judgment debtor fail to comply voluntarily, the creditor may request the CJEA to enforce the judgment coercively, with enforcement costs charged on a pro-rata basis.
The party seeking an appellate trial must submit the application to the first-instance court or through authorized representatives, including necessary details and evidentiary materials. The appellate court may uphold, revise, or annul the first-instance judgment and remand the case for retrial.
Cassation and retrial are extraordinary remedies in Vietnam for reviewing legally effective court judgments. The Supreme People's Court oversees these processes, particularly for significant or complex cases. Cassation involves reviewing judgments issued with serious legal violations, with a three-year appeal limit. Retrial occurs when new crucial evidence emerges, requiring a request within one year of discovery.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments or Arbitral Awards
Vietnam recognizes foreign court judgments or arbitral awards based on international treaties or reciprocity principles. The statute of limitations for recognition and enforcement is three years from the judgment's legal effect date. Vietnam is a member of the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention). Enforcing a foreign judgment requires recognition by a competent court and enforcement by the CJEA, with total durations varying from 18 months to three years depending on complexity and cooperation levels. From January 1, 2012, to September 30, 2019, the success rate for recognizing and enforcing foreign arbitral awards was 49%, while for foreign judgments, it was around 46%.
In addition to court proceedings, civil disputes in Vietnam may be resolved through alternative means, including:
Commercial mediation offers a voluntary dispute resolution mechanism allowing parties to amicably resolve conflicts with the help of a neutral mediator without resorting to formal litigation or arbitration. This approach is particularly beneficial for commercial disputes where preserving business relationships is paramount. A mediated settlement agreement can be recognized by the court, rendering it binding and enforceable.
Arbitration is the second most utilized dispute resolution method in Vietnam after court litigation, valued for its flexibility and efficiency. The Vietnam International Arbitration Centre (VIAC) is a frequently chosen venue for arbitration in the country. An arbitral award is final and enforceable upon issuance.
Although an arbitral award is final and enforceable upon issuance, parties may seek to cancel (or set aside) the award within 30 days of receipt. If canceled, parties may either agree to re-arbitrate or initiate a lawsuit. Grounds for cancellation include the absence of a valid arbitration agreement, procedural non-compliance, disputes falling outside the tribunal's jurisdiction, reliance on forged evidence, or contravention of fundamental principles of Vietnamese law. However, the interpretation of what constitutes these principles lacks explicit guidance, leading to inconsistencies among courts.
For foreign parties involved in arbitration, key documents such as the Power of Attorney for local counsel should be duly notarized and legalized. There have been instances where awards were canceled due to issues with these documents, despite the 2010 Law on Commercial Arbitration not explicitly requiring such actions.
Contact us: all@lhdfirm.com
© 2025 LHD Law Firm
Comment